"Not Rational?"

I'm still a bit worked up over the reply to a recent assessment of Obama that was dismissed as "not rational." I know I responded with strong language and examples, but I'm still upset. Here are more of my thoughts:

What "wasn't rational" about the assessment? It was never said. Here is what is "irrational." Letting Barney Frank, Charlie Rangel head Congressional commitees. Ruining health insurance for abou 85-90% of Americans to take care of the 10-15% who "aren't covered," about half of them can be explained away (illegals, opting not to purchase health insurance--like my two sons, being too lazy to sign up for Medicaid or S-Chip, etc.). Hillary Clinton pledging hundreds of billions of dollars as sort of a "climate reparations" to third world countries, letting the UN "oversee" the funds, you know, so the petty tyrant dictators don't just spend the money on themselves and consolidating their own power (and the UN has been so very effective over the years, hasn't it?). Hailing Ted Kennedy as a hero, "An American Lion," when, the truth is, he was a scumbag, from the death of Mary Jo Kopechne (or at least leaving the scene of her homocide) to libeling Robert Bork to being a hypocrite with his hundreds of millions of dollars (Did I mention so many affairs as to put Tiger Woods to shame? Why wasn't he excommunicated from the Catholic Church on general principle rather than exalted as St. Ted, as it was St John, his equally nefarious brother?). Giving taxpayer money to the same people who drove the auto companies, the banks, the financial/investment companies into the ground. My US Senator telling me, huffily, that the science on man-made global warming "was settled," as if saying I should stop sending her letters on the hoax. Need I go on? "Wasn't rational!" Yeah, right....